Let the debate begin..
Jun. 16th, 2003 11:35 pmIn my English Comp 2 class we had to do debates and one of the topics was about Viagra and birth control. According to the people who did the debate there are quite a few insurance companies that cover Viagra but not a single form of BC. I haven't done the research on it so I'll just take their word, but the point is if a company provides coverage for Viagra should they also provide coverage for BC?
To me BC should not be viewed as simply an optional pill to prevent pregnancy since there are so many women who use it for very valid health reasons. Viagra's only health benefit seems to be emotional if a man suffers mental anguish from not being able to perform sexually. Therefore, BC should definitely be covered if Viagra is. To not cover it is blatant sexual dicrimination.
To me BC should not be viewed as simply an optional pill to prevent pregnancy since there are so many women who use it for very valid health reasons. Viagra's only health benefit seems to be emotional if a man suffers mental anguish from not being able to perform sexually. Therefore, BC should definitely be covered if Viagra is. To not cover it is blatant sexual dicrimination.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-16 09:56 pm (UTC)This damned culture is so afraid of female sexuality!
no subject
Date: 2003-06-16 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-16 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-17 07:55 pm (UTC)