(no subject)
Oct. 4th, 2001 03:15 pmmy doctor keeps asking me if i have a normal menstrual flow, or if it's heavy, or whatever.
i keep telling him that i have no basis for comparison, it's normal for me. i have never been someone else while they were menstruating, no do i intend to.
silly old man.
i keep telling him that i have no basis for comparison, it's normal for me. i have never been someone else while they were menstruating, no do i intend to.
silly old man.
That's what the cretin meant...
I swear, men are so callous sometimes!
no subject
Date: 2001-10-04 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-04 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-05 08:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-05 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-10-05 04:21 pm (UTC)The first reply to the post, from lunahalo, refers to the doctor as a cretin and as callous. But first she states that obviously the doctor meant "normal period as in normal for you..."
Then the next reply, from the olive, "I'm not a male-basher, but..." and proceeds to bash male doctors and health care providers by inference. At least the male obgyns she has had. How many is that exactly? Two? Three? Out of how many male gyn. mds in the world?
Is it right of me to disparage all Eskimos becausethe only two Eskimos I've ever met are in my opinion the pits?
Then an intelligent reply from urania basically stating that her female gyn. asked her the same question, and she asked for clarification, which she recieved and shared in her post. Thanks for sharing urania, as that was informative and I learned something.
So a thread that started under the pretense of discussing the question of what is normal flow and what is heavy flow had a subtext, it seems.
I won't post anymore in this forum, as I agree that it is not quite right of me to participate anonymously. But I don't think I am being rude if you compare my posts with the others in this thread. I did not call anyone a cretin or callous, though I did infer that risingentropy might be silly for the way she took the question, and for not asking her doctor for clarification.
Re:
Date: 2001-10-05 04:26 pm (UTC)i don't think it's necessary to bring up other posts, either. i was referring to your post, not to the context of any other posts. simply because someone else inferred that the doctor was a "silly old man" doesn't really mean that you have to infer that the poster is a "silly girl." it seemed a bit presumptuous to me to call someone this without knowing anything else about them. perhaps i'm reading too much into this, but this is simply my take on things.
no subject
Date: 2001-10-05 04:30 pm (UTC)-A different Anon poster who prefers to remain anonymous.