[identity profile] granolaah.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] menstrualhut
How many of you women out there have the most amazing sex on your periods???
I swear... it gets downright spiritual.

Date: 2002-03-16 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiasophia.livejournal.com
*raises hand*
(deleted comment)

"he's doing it for him"

Date: 2002-03-17 06:57 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Sister, wake-up!
He's always doing for "him". He truly wants you if there is a commitment...are you married to him?
Amazing the way a lass will try and rationalize sinful(to your soul)actions. "He wants me"...yes, as long as you give it to him for free.
(deleted comment)

Re: "he's doing it for him"

Date: 2002-03-17 11:06 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Remaining anonymous makes me wrong? Your anger reflects that your conscious is bothering you--good sign. Now READ THIS: A prostitute has the brains to charge what you give away and call "meaningful".
Tell boyfriend 'no sex' until marriage...and see how 'meaning-full' he gets.
Amazing...and we girls wonder why we are called the "weaker sex".

*stab*

Date: 2002-03-17 11:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaypoisson.livejournal.com
you're one of those annoying irrational ladies that doesnt get any, huh? so u're bitter against like every woman. and you'd be surprised to see how many men there are that would wait till marriage, damn you! you're like my mother, i want to stab you. baaahh, cant think in words, just want to injure you.....

Re: *stab*

Date: 2002-03-17 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
So, I'm irrational huh, honey? (said while taking knife out of belly) You need therapy---'nuff said'.

(PS-men would learn to wait, and respect you for it...if not screw him, you don't need the heartache. At least I know me husband wanted me, not just me flesh. Anyway, my father also waited and still loves me mum after 56 years of marriage. Not everyone comes from a dysfunctional family, ya know, believe it or not!)

Re: *stab*

Date: 2002-03-17 01:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuwanda-1998.livejournal.com
Generalize MUCH?

My husband and I had sex for 4 years before we were married, and we've been married for close to 20 years now and together for 24 years. The first, and hopefully the last, marriage for both of us.

My parents also had sex before they were married and have been married for 37 years. Also their first, and hopefully last, marriage.

Premarital sex in no way implies that the man doesn't care for the woman and won't marry her because he's getting sex *for free* (free apparently being without having to commit to marriage in your warped anonymous view.)

There are also couples who don't ever wish to legally tie the knot, but simply live together in a loving, caring, committed and SEXUAL relationship for their whole lives. A piece of paper saying their committment is legal doesn't mean it'll last, and not having that piece of paper doesn't mean they're any less committed to each other.

And if a man is told he can't have sex until marriage why would you assume he's marrying you because he loves you and wants to spend his life with you? Maybe he's just marrying you so he can finally get laid!!

How positively laughable.

Nu

Re: *stab*

Date: 2002-03-17 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thanks for proving my sentiments, "Nu"...you both got married! You're going to say that he married you because you had sex before marriage? I doubt it. Maybe you and the folks rolled before marriage, but you followed through by tying the knots! Congrats Sweetie!
I still stand by me initial point...calling an orgasm "spiritual" is insulting to those who are true 'spiritualists'. Is it that easy to understand who God/Goddess is?...just screw while bleeding?

Re: *stab*

Date: 2002-03-17 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaypoisson.livejournal.com
its not the orgasm thats spiritual, u idiot, it's the whole damn act and the reasons why two people are doing the act that is spiritual. and what gives u the right to know what a 'true spiritualist' is? you're so friggin cold and mean! i cant believe u're married. damnit! and i dont think people fuck to understand the 'divine being, god, goddess' whatever the hell it is. it's to understand themselves and their friggin partner. where's me gun? i need to shoot a bullet of sense into your brain.

stop being so fucking anonymous too

Re: *stab*

Date: 2002-03-17 02:50 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
WOW!!! I'm "cold and mean"? Then what would you call shooting "a bullet" into my brain? Warm and caring?
Two words, Sweetie..."ANGER MANAGEMENT".

You young lassies just don't get it, do you? Just don't go and get all dramatic and whiny when your boyfriend leaves you for some "fresh meat". Unless you are so brainwashed that you think that its supposed to be that way.
PS..what difference does it make if I add a name? What would it matter?

Re: *stab*

Date: 2002-03-17 06:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raintaker.livejournal.com
anonymous is for people who arent proud of what they are. remaining anonymous proves you to be a coward.

Re: *stab*

Date: 2002-03-18 11:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gigglinggorgon.livejournal.com
lol, I'm the one who wanted sex before we got married, heh heh heh. I still have a MUCH higher sex drive than my husband, heh heh heh. But... being married in now way stops men (or women) from seeking 'fresh meat'. I see plenty of adultry, plenty of divorce, plenty of it all, married and unmarried alike.

I was raised to believe in no sex before marriage, to even feel guilty for feelings of desire that I had no intent of acting on, yet it didn't stop me... just made me feel worthless and suicidal with my first pregnancy.

But now, now I am GLAD I lived with my husband first, so I could deal with some of our issues before I felt trapped by them, and my grandmother felt the same way about her marriage. I am sorry if it offends your religious or moral beliefs, but the fact that you don't agree with this point of view makes it no less valid or spritually appropriate for the individuals involved.

Re: *stab*

Date: 2002-03-17 09:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
please keep this on a civil level. thank you.

Re: "he's doing it for him"

Date: 2002-03-17 03:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
remaining anonymous is no longer an option. the purpose of this place is respectful conversation, questions and information. you are providing none of these. feelk free to return when you get a civil tongue in your head.

Re: "he's doing it for him"

Date: 2002-03-18 11:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gigglinggorgon.livejournal.com
hmmm... I agree with how it feels like he's doing it for ME sometimes... and how special that it... show beautiful...

and YES we are married, but it was just as GOOD when we were fornicating, just as spiritual, just as beautiful. In fact, recently I have been wishing we had just stayed engaged and not gotten married, though I felt enough guilt without the likes of you butting in before!!!

ditto

Date: 2002-03-16 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bonniebon.livejournal.com
its like that for me too, I seem to be very in touch with my feelings at that time, that must be the time of the month when I'm most affectionate and loving. Dunno why, but I like it :)

"Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 06:30 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I am amazed at the way some people 'cheapen' their sense of spirituality by saying that their sexual activity is "spiritual". A dog, or any animal has sex...what makes something a spiritual event is a connection of one's Divine soul with the Supreme One...not a 'fantastic orgasm'.
Sex outside of marriage is exploitation of the soul..how dare you think it is "spiritual"?

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 08:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cath555.livejournal.com
how dare you chastize from behind a veil of anonymity?

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 11:17 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"Anonymity"? Not really, just look inside your heart and you'll find me...I'm your soul talking, saying, sex is just that...sex. Not a Divine Revelation. If you're angry, sister, you're angry at yourself...not me.

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 02:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cath555.livejournal.com
hmmm.... maybe if you got off your damn high horse long enough, you'd have thought to question whether or not I agree with the basic premise behind your statement.

My own view or heart or soul is irrelivent here- what angers me is your belief that you're right, and the rest of the world therefor MUST be wrong. what's right to you may not be right for your neighbour- but who are you to JUDGE another? no human is so perfect they have the right to judge the morals or beliefs of others without engaging in hypocracy.



Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 02:10 pm (UTC)

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I think I'm the one whose being judged unfairly...one lass even wishes to "stab" me! If I'm not be in step with a world where more than half of the marriages fail, I'm glad! Maybe its not about me and my "high horse"...its about facts.
As far as following morals and beliefs, certain values are universal. If we just made up our own version by what 'feels good', chaos would rule.
I'm only asking my sisters to control their five senses, a basic tenant of any belief system.
This world is still ruled my men who will use a lass and leave her in the dirt, for the sake of some sensual enjoyment. This is what women's rights have lead us to? We are giving permission to men now to exploit and rape us, physically, mentally and emotionally? Me mum didn't suffer just to give me the right to have some bloke say, "hey, you're liberated now, let me ENJOY".

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
63.14.237.140 was the IP for this post

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
63.17.15.28 was the ip from this post

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
it won't happen again. anonymous posts are suspended for the time being, to stop "masked morons" from playing with fire.

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cath555.livejournal.com
thanks- I feel kinda sheepish for being drawn in, but the anonymous approach always makes it seem like more of an attack than an opinion right from the start to me. No fair hiding. ;-)

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
thank you for standing up to a bully, and not lowering yourself to the level of mudslinging involved.

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
right you are. :) this is a place for backup, not flames.

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 01:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuwanda-1998.livejournal.com
Spirituality doesn't always mean the Christian sense of what's spiritual.

I'm not a Christian and don't believe in the Christian God, yet I consider myself to be a spiritual being.

Nu

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 03:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scottobear.livejournal.com
63.17.16.121 was the ip from this post.

Re: "Spiritual Sex"

Date: 2002-03-17 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cuzgoatsrkool.livejournal.com
i dont want to start a fight or anything...but as of now..to me sex is just that "sex" nothing great about it...
my counsellor says maybe that will change over time but..i dunno...i dont think u need to be criticized for what u think..but u didnt need to think that their beliefs were wrong either....
i seee where you're coming from though....

June 2012

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718 1920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 03:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios